Automated iterative reclustering framework for determining hierarchical functional networks in resting state f<scp>MRI</scp>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To spatially cluster resting state-functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data into potential networks, there are only a few general approaches that determine the number of networks/clusters, despite a wide variety of techniques proposed for clustering. For individual subjects, extraction of a large number of spatially disjoint clusters results in multiple small networks that are spatio-temporally homogeneous but irreproducible across subjects. Alternatively, extraction of a small number of clusters creates spatially large networks that are temporally heterogeneous but spatially reproducible across subjects. We propose a fully automatic, iterative reclustering framework in which a small number of spatially large, heterogeneous networks are initially extracted to maximize spatial reproducibility. Subsequently, the large networks are iteratively subdivided to create spatially reproducible subnetworks until the overall within-network homogeneity does not increase substantially. The proposed approach discovers a rich network hierarchy in the brain while simultaneously optimizing spatial reproducibility of networks across subjects and individual network homogeneity. We also propose a novel metric to measure the connectivity of brain regions, and in a simulation study show that our connectivity metric and framework perform well in the face of low signal to noise and initial segmentation errors. Experimental results generated using real fMRI data show that the proposed metric improves stability of network clusters across subjects, and generates a meaningful pattern for spatially hierarchical structure of the brain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.049 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".