MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1564767861 · doi:10.1002/latj.201190031

Vigorous recovery in laser materials processing

2011· article· en· W1564767861 on OpenAlexaff
Arnold Mayer

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser Technik Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Material Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberian dollarValue (mathematics)BusinessAgricultural economicsEconomicsFinanceMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract According to the annual survey performed by Optech Consulting the global market for laser systems for materials processing accounted for $ 7.9 billion (€ 5.9 billion) in 2010. As compared to the $ 5.3 billion (€ 3.8 billion) reached in 2009 this corresponds to an increase of 49 % (55 %). Note that the growth rate is larger for the market measured in Euro because the average value of the Euro vs. the US dollar decreased by 4 %. After the historic slump in the crisis year 2009 the growth in 2010 was not fully sufficient to take the market back to its former record high of $ 9.4 billion (€ 6.4 billion) reached in 2008(see Fig. 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaser Technik JournalSame topicLaser Material Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207