MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1564768809 · doi:10.3138/tric.31.1.20

Haunted by <i>The Cradle Will Rock</i>History and Adaptation in Jason Sherman’s <i>It’s All True</i>

2010· article· en· W1564768809 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Nancy Copeland

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Research in Canada · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheater, Performance, and Music History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusicalPoliticsLyricsProletariatAppropriationDramaNarrativeAestheticsArtLiteratureState (computer science)HistoryLawPhilosophyPolitical scienceEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It’s All True(1999), Jason Sherman’s play about the 1937 premiere of Marc Blitzstein’s proletarian musical The Cradle Will Rock, brings together two central elements of Sherman’s work: historically-based political theatre and adaptation. In choosing to dramatize the events leading up to the opening night of The Cradle Will Rock, Sherman stages an iconic episode in the history of American political theatre that resonates with current concerns about state funding for the arts and uses it to construct a debate about the social function of theatre today. It’s All Trueexemplifies the complex nature of adaptations: it is not only “haunted” by its numerous sources; it is also productive, giving new life to them through appropriation, most notably to The Cradle Will Rock itself. Although, due to copyright restrictions, It’s All Trueuses neither Blitzstein’s music nor his lyrics, The Cradle Will Rockis a ubiquitous presence in Sherman’s play, providing an alternative structure focusing on proletarian heroes rather than celebrities, including gender in its political analysis, and eschewing a linear narrative in favour of an exposé of the circumstances leading up to the celebrated opening night of Blitzstein’s legendary music drama.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.013
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre Research in CanadaSame topicTheater, Performance, and Music HistoryFrench-language works237,207