MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1564860091 · doi:10.1300/j047v19n01_04

Accessing US and EU Markets for Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods

2006· article· en· W1564860091 on OpenAlexaffabout
May T. Yeung, Jill E. Hobbs, William A. Kerr

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessDomestic marketNutraceuticalNiche marketGovernment (linguistics)International marketMarket accessInternational tradeValue (mathematics)Industrial organizationMarketingAgricultureCommerce

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural health products represent a rapidly expanding and high value segment of the market for agricultural products. Many of these products individually represent niche markets, which present a problem for firms from small market countries-domestic markets will be too small for firms to achieve a minimum efficient size and, as a result, to reach their full potential access to foreign market is required. Canada represents such a market. The international marketing of nutraceuticals and functional foods is characterized by barriers to market access and greatly differing regulatory regimes. The marketing challenges faced by Canadian exporters in two major potential markets, the US and the EU, are examined and a market access strategy that includes a major role for government is outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International Food & Agribusiness MarketingSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207