MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1564890330 · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3254

Erasmus in the twentieth century: interpretations c. 1920-2000

2004· article· en· W1564890330 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueChoice Reviews Online · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsErasmus+HistoryLiteraturePhilosophyAncient historyArtArt historyThe Renaissance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Erasmus in the Twentieth Century: Interpretations c 1920-2000. By Bruce Mansfield. Erasmus Studies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003. xiv + 324 pp. CDN$70.00 (cloth); US$70.00 (cloth). The National Library of Canada describes this book, not inappropriately, as the final volume in the trilogy which includes Phoenix of His Age (1974) and Man on His Own (1992) (p. iv). In preface Mansfield is more precise: Erasmus in the Twentieth Century both is and is not a sequel to the two previous studies: does indeed continue the interpretations of Erasmus analyzed in the two previous volumes, but it has become a book of a different (p. ix). The change was caused by a fundamental shift in the study of Erasmus in the twentieth century from apologetics to scientific scholarship. In reflecting on the enormous growth of scholarly publications in the twentieth century, the variety of critical approaches, and the technicalities of scholarship, Mansfield has produced a work that is inevitably more difficult to read than the previous volumes. It is also less entertaining. In the previous volumes Mansfield was interested not only in the fortunes of Erasmus's reputation, hut also in the writers who shaped the images of Erasmus. Hence the portrait of the Anglican Evangelical Isaac Milner, or the brief but sympathetic biography of Mark Pattison, in rum Anglican Evangelical, Tractarian, and liberal (Man on His Own, pp. 98-99, 159-164). While we seek to understand apologies through the character of their authors, scholarship pretends to be validated by its sheer facelessness. There was little room, therefore, in Erasmus in the Twentieth Century to describe the nexus between the scholar and subject-though one should not overlook the acute psychological analysis of the tragic Stefan Zweig, distinguished Jewish biographer of Erasmus, who, unable to come to grips with the reality of the Nazi regime, committed suicide in Brazil in 1942 (pp. 8-10). Mansfield has not, however, been defeated by the challenges of twentieth-century scholarship. This book may not be easy to read, but in both eloquence and illuminating synthesis matches the preceding volumes. Mansfield s prose is energetic, imagistic, and varied, ranging between the language of high dignity and humble familiarity. Moreover, Mansfield's skill in organization and synthesis has brought coherence to the many-sided scholarship on Erasmus, and set in an illuminating perspective. Further, Mansfield has embarked upon an intellectual quest, an adventure in locating Erasmus within the geography of twentieth-century thought. Thus, in two separate chapters Mansfield considers the scholarship represented by the anniversaries of Erasmus's death (1936) and birth (1967-1970). In the former celebrations his name was attached to values that were manifestly under threat: peace, toleration, liberal education, even democracy (p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChoice Reviews OnlineSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207