Genetic analysis and epigenetic silencing of <i>At4CL1</i> and <i>At4CL2</i> expression in transgenic <i>Arabidopsis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
4-coumarate::CoA ligase (4CL) gene family members are involved in channeling carbon flow into branch pathways of phenylpropanoid metabolism. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants containing the At4CL1 or At4CL2 promoter fused to the beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene show developmentally regulated GUS expression in the xylem tissues of the root and shoot. To identify regulatory genes involved in the developmental regulation of At4CL and other phenylpropanoid-specific genes, we generated ethyl methyl sulfate mutagenized populations of At4CL1::GUS and At4CL2::GUS transgenic lines and screened approximately 16,000 progeny for reduced or altered GUS expression. Several lines with reproducible patterns of reduced GUS expression were identified. However, the GUS-expression phenotype segregated in a non-Mendelian manner in all of the identified lines. Also, GUS expression was restored by 5-azacytidine (aza) treatment, suggesting inhibitory DNA methylation of the transgene. Southern analysis confirmed DNA methylation of the proximal promoter sequences of the transgene only in the mutant lines. In addition, retransformation of At4CL::GUS lines with further At4CL promoter constructs enhanced the GUS-silencing phenotype. Taken together, these results suggest that the isolated mutants are epimutants. Apparently, two different modes of silencing were engaged in the At4CL1::GUS and At4CL2::GUS silenced lines. While silencing in the seedlings of the At4CL1::GUS lines was root specific in seedlings, it affected all organs in the At4CL2::GUS lines. Also, At4CL1::GUS transgene silencing was confined to the transgene but At4CL2::GUS silencing extended to the endogenous At4CL2 gene. Organ-specific silencing of the At4CL1::GUS transgene cannot be explained by current models in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".