MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1565410573 · doi:10.1002/9781118268223.gloss

Glossary: Asset Class Benchmarks

2010· other· en· W1565410573 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Schneeweis, Garry B. Crowder, Hossein Kazemi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Finance and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlossaryClass (philosophy)Asset (computer security)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceLinguisticsComputer securityPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The S & P 500 is a value -weighted index.The stocks included in the S & P 500 are those of large publicly held companies that trade on either of the two largest American stock market companies; the NYSE Euronext and the NASDAQ OMX.The index does include a handful of non -U.S. companies (six as of July 1, 2009).This group includes both former U.S. companies that have reincorporated outside the United States and fi rms that have never been incorporated in the United States.The components of the S & P 500 are selected by committee.Russell 1000: A market capitalization -weighted benchmark index made up of the 1,000 highest -ranking U.S. stocks in the Russell 3000.Russell 2000: The Russell 2000 Index is a small -cap stock market index of the bottom 2,000 stocks in the Russell 3000 Index.MSCI EAFE: The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free fl oatadjusted market capitalization index designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the United States and Canada.As of June 2007, the MSCI EAFE Index consisted of the following 21 developed market country indices:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0090.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2680.170

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCorporate Finance and Governance→French-language works237,207→