MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sex Therapy, Male

2010· other· en· W1565419168 on OpenAlexaff
Peggy J. Kleinplatz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSex therapyOrgasmPremature ejaculationEjaculationErectile dysfunctionSexual intercourseSexual dysfunctionPsychologySexual desireMeaning (existential)Sexual behaviorMedicineClinical psychologyHuman sexualityPsychotherapistPsychoanalysisPsychiatryInternal medicinePopulationGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The treatment of male sexual difficulties is still in its infancy, but it has had quite a dramatic beginning over the last 40 years or so. In 1966, Masters and Johnson published their seminal description of the physiology of male and female sexual response as observed in their laboratory. They referred to their observations as the human sexual response cycle (HSRC) model, which consisted of four stages: excitement, plateau, orgasm, and resolution. Subsequently, in 1970, Masters and Johnson provided the first systematic approach to the treatment of sexual problems and became the founders of what is now called sex therapy. Problems came to be defined in terms of deviations from the 1966 HSRC model. For men, this meant that the major sexual dysfunctions were identified as what was then called “impotence,” now known as “erectile dysfunction” (ED); “premature ejaculation,” now known as “rapid ejaculation” (RE); “ejaculatory incompetence,” now known as “delayed ejaculation” (DE); or “male orgasmic dysfunction” and “dyspareunia,” meaning pain associated with sexual intercourse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Corsini Encyclopedia of PsychologySame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207