MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1565437766 · doi:10.18433/j39k5h

Organic Glues or Fibrin Glues from Pooled Plasma: Efficacy, Safety and Potential as Scaffold Delivery Systems

2012· review· en· W1565437766 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemostasis and retained surgical items
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibrinScaffoldMedicineBiomedical engineeringSurgeryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 1976, fibrin glues have been attracting medical interest, spreading from their initial use as a hemostatic agent in cardiovascular surgery to other fields of surgery. Studies have compared the efficacy of fibrin glues vs sutures in surgery. However, few comparisons have been made of the efficacy and safety of the different fibrin glues commercially available. Recently, fibrin glues have been tested as a scaffold delivery system for various substances inside the body (drugs, growth factors, stem cells). The infectious risk (viruses, new germs) of this blood-derived product was also studied in assays on viral inactivation methods. The development of autologous fibrin glues offers a solution to the problem of infectious risk. This review examines the current state of knowledge on the efficacy, safety and future potential of fibrin glues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it