MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1565448920 · doi:10.26421/qic13.3-4-9

Efficient quantum communication under collective noise

2013· article· en· W1565448920 on OpenAlexafffund
Michalis Skotiniotis, Wolfgang Dür, Barbara Kraus

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantum Information and Computation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversität InnsbruckAustrian Science FundEuropean Commission
KeywordsDecoding methodsOverhead (engineering)Quantum decoherenceTransmission (telecommunications)Topology (electrical circuits)MathematicsNoise (video)Computer scienceQuantumEncoding (memory)Constant (computer programming)Discrete mathematicsAlgorithmCombinatoricsQuantum mechanicsTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a new quantum communication protocol for the transmission of quantum information under collective noise. Our protocol utilizes a decoherence-free subspace in such a way that an optimal asymptotic transmission rate is achieved, while at the same time encoding and decoding operations can be efficiently implemented. The encoding and decoding circuit requires a number of elementary gates that scale linearly with the number of transmitted qudits, $m$. The logical depth of our encoding and decoding operations is constant and depends only on the channel in question. For channels described by an arbitrary discrete group $G$, i.e.~with a discrete number, $\lvert G\rvert$, of possible noise operators, perfect transmission at a rate $m/(m+r)$ is achieved with an overhead that scales at most as $\mathcal{O}(d^r)$ where the number of auxiliary qudits, $r$, depends solely on the group in question. Moreover, this overhead is independent of the number of transmitted qudits, $m$. For certain groups, e.g.~cyclic groups, we find that the overhead scales only linearly with the number of group elements $|G|$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuantum Information and ComputationSame topicQuantum Information and CryptographyFrench-language works237,207