Effects of mild heat stress and grain challenge on acid-base balance and rumen tissue histology in lambs1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of heat stress (HS) and grain challenge (GC) on acid-base balance and rumen tissue histology in lambs was investigated using 24 yearling wether lambs (58 +/- 4.5 kg of BW) in a 2 x 2 factorial experiment with repeated measures for day (10, 14, and 17) of sampling. The factors were temperature [thermoneutral zone (TN) vs. HS] and diet (control vs. GC). Lambs were blocked by BW and assigned to 1 of 4 treatments in temperature-controlled rooms: 1) TN (temperature = 18 to 20 degrees C; relative humidity = 30%; 2) TN + GC; 3) HS (temperature = 35 degrees C for 9 h/d, 20 degrees C for 15 h/d; relative humidity = 40%); and 4) HS + GC. Venous blood samples were collected at 1800 on the first day of GC (d 10), in the middle of GC (d 14), and at the end of the trial (d 17) by jugular venipuncture and analyzed for pH, gases, hematocrit, plasma ions, and total protein. After all measurements in live animals were taken on d 17, lambs were slaughtered, and tissue samples were obtained from the ventral sac of the rumen for histological assessment. Except for the concentration of plasma glucose (P = 0.04) and total protein (P < 0.01), there were no (P > 0.05) diet x temperature interactions. With HS, the concentration of Na+ and Cl- in the control group decreased at d 14 and then increased by d 17, and respiration rates in the control group decreased linearly (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, respiration rates and the concentration of Cl- in the GC lambs increased linearly over time, whereas the concentration of Na+ decreased linearly (P < 0.05) across time. Under HS, the partial pressure of carbon dioxide, total carbon dioxide, the partial pressure of oxygen and oxygen saturation, and the concentration of Mg2+, glucose, and HCO3- showed quadratic (P < 0.05) responses with time. In both treatments, DMI, base excess of extracellular fluid, base excess of blood, and standard bicarbonate increased linearly (P < 0.05), and hematocrit, plasma protein, Ca2+, anion gap, and plasma strong ion difference decreased linearly (P < 0.05) across day. Compared with the control group, the GC group had decreased papillae count in the ruminal ventral sac (1.3 vs. 1.5; P < 0.05). These results suggest that under HS the acidifying effects of GC on acid-base balance in lambs were counteracted in the short-term through respiratory adaptation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".