MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1565872043 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1400065

CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY OF MERCURY SULFOSALTS – GALKHAITE, (Hg<sub>5+<i>x</i></sub>Cu<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>)Cs<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>As<sub>4</sub>S<sub>12</sub>(<i>x</i>≈ 0): CRYSTAL STRUCTURE AND REVISION OF THE CHEMICAL FORMULA

2014· article· en· W1565872043 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectron microprobeChemistryCrystallographyCrystal structureCrystal chemistryMineralogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three specimens of galkhaite from the Getchell mine (G), Nevada, USA; the Gal-Khaya As-Hg-Sb deposit (Gk), Yakutia, Russia; and Signols (S), Piedmont, Italy, have been fully characterized through single-crystal X-ray diffraction and electronmicroprobe analyses. Chemical data indicate the formulae [(Hg&lt;inf&gt;4.61&lt;/inf&gt;Zn&lt;inf&gt;0.38&lt;/inf&gt;Fe&lt;inf&gt;0.04&lt;/inf&gt;)&lt;inf&gt;Σ5.03&lt;/inf&gt;(Cu&lt;inf&gt;1.03&lt;/inf&gt;Ag&lt;inf&gt;0.04&lt;/inf&gt;)&lt;inf&gt;Σ1.07&lt;/inf&gt;]&lt;inf&gt;Σ6.10&lt;/inf&gt;(Cs&lt;inf&gt;0.76&lt;/inf&gt;Tl&lt;inf&gt;0.20&lt;/inf&gt;)&lt;inf&gt;Σ0.96&lt;/inf&gt;(AS&lt;inf&gt;3.81&lt;/inf&gt;Sb&lt;inf&gt;0.04&lt;/inf&gt;)&lt;inf&gt;Σ3.85&lt;/inf&gt;S&lt;inf&gt;12.06&lt;/inf&gt; (G), [(Hg&lt;inf&gt;4.66&lt;/inf&gt;Zn&lt;inf&gt;0.32&lt;/inf&gt;)&lt;inf&gt;Σ4.98&lt;/inf&gt;(Cu&lt;inf&gt;0.55&lt;/inf&gt;Ag&lt;inf&gt;0.45&lt;/inf&gt;)&lt;inf&gt;Σ1.00&lt;/inf&gt;]&lt;inf&gt;Σ5.98&lt;/inf&gt;(Cs&lt;inf&gt;0.74&lt;/inf&gt;Tl&lt;inf&gt;0.06&lt;/inf&gt;(As&lt;inf&gt;3.42&lt;/inf&gt;Sb&lt;inf&gt;0.56&lt;/inf&gt;)&lt;inf&gt;Σ3.98&lt;/inf&gt;S&lt;inf&gt;12.05&lt;/inf&gt; (Gk), and [(Hg&lt;inf&gt;4.10&lt;/inf&gt;Zn&lt;inf&gt;0.85&lt;/inf&gt;)&lt;inf&gt;Σ4.95&lt;/inf&gt;(Cu&lt;inf&gt;0.89&lt;/inf&gt;Ag&lt;inf&gt;0.16&lt;/inf&gt;)&lt;inf&gt;Σ1.05&lt;/inf&gt;]&lt;inf&gt;Σ6.00&lt;/inf&gt;Cs&lt;inf&gt;0.95&lt;/inf&gt;As&lt;inf&gt;3.64&lt;/inf&gt;Sb&lt;inf&gt;0.16&lt;/inf&gt;)Σ3.80 S&lt;inf&gt;12.19&lt;/inf&gt; (S). Unit-cell parameters are a 10.405(3) Å (G), 10.443(1) Å (Gk), and 10.332(2) Å (S), space group I4 ̄3m. The crystal structure of the three specimens has been solved to R&lt;inf&gt;1&lt;/inf&gt; = 0.029 (G), 0.028 (Gk), and 0.031 (S). It is a three-dimensional framework of HgS&lt;inf&gt;4&lt;/inf&gt; and AsS&lt;inf&gt;3&lt;/inf&gt; polyhedra, with Cs hosted in large 12-fold coordinated cavities. The introduction of Cs&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;, as well as minor Tl&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; , at these structural positions requires the replacement of Hg&lt;sup&gt;2+&lt;/sup&gt; by Cu&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; . The mixed site occupancy at the Hg site of galkhaite is a case of valency-imposed double site-occupancy. Consequently, the idealized chemical formula of galkhaite can be written as (Hg&lt;inf&gt;5&lt;/inf&gt;Cu)CsAs&lt;inf&gt;4&lt;/inf&gt;S&lt;inf&gt;12&lt;/inf&gt;. Taking into account the possible existence of vacancy in the structural cavities, the formula can be generalized as (Hg&lt;inf&gt;5+x&lt;/inf&gt;Cu&lt;inf&gt;1-x&lt;/inf&gt;)&lt;inf&gt;Σ6&lt;/inf&gt;Cs&lt;inf&gt;1-x&lt;/inf&gt;As&lt;inf&gt;4&lt;/inf&gt;S&lt;inf&gt;12&lt;/inf&gt; (x ≈ 0).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it