Power-Aware Wireless Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Power-aware protocol design is important due to the limited battery capacity of the mobile devices making up the ad hoc wireless network. The performance of the medium access control (MAC) scheme not only has a significant effect on the performance of the routing method employed, but also on the energy consumption of the wireless network interface card (NIC). Thus, a thorough energy-based comparative and performance study is essential to any bandwidth-based study. We explore the shortcomings of the MAC schemes proposed for ad hoc wireless networks in the context of power awareness herein. In addition, we investigate the potential energy consumption pitfalls of non-power-based and power-based routing schemes. Moreover, we introduce a thorough energy-based performance study of power-aware routing protocols for wireless mobile ad hoc networks. Our energy consumption model is based on an implementation of the IEEE 802.11 physical layer convergence protocol (PLCP) and MAC sublayers. We also present the statistical performance metrics measured by our simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".