MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1566065409

Memory and Being: The Uncanny in the Films of Andrei Tarkovsky

2012· article· en· W1566065409 on OpenAlex
Daniel McFadden

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUncannyInterpretation (philosophy)DreamPsychoanalysisArtArt historyLiteraturePhilosophyPsychologyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soviet film maker Andrei Tarkovsky is obsessed with the image of the home. Throughout his filmic oeuvre, we see Tarkovsky again and again returning to the space of the home. This paper will examine the status and importance of the home in Tarkovsky's films Solaris, Nostalghia and Mirror. Interpretation will be made through Sigmund Freud's concept of the “uncanny”. The “uncanny” is especially useful as a method for understanding the highly symbolic and obfuscated dream and memory sequences that litter Tarkovsky's films. I argue that the home and the protagonists of these films share a metaphorical relationship; the homes (as depicted) are visual analogues of the characters' psyches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationFrench-language works237,207