Le débat au sein de la CSN sur l’organisation de la santé mentale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les auteurs essaient de rendre compte, dans cet article, des enjeux de la politique en santé mentale en voie d'élaboration au sein de la C.S.N., et des débats que cela suscite dans cette centrale syndicale. Dans un premier temps, ils décrivent l'implication et le rôle des syndicats dans l'évolution de la psychiatrie au Québec au cours des dernières années. Ensuite, ils retracent les principaux événements qui ont mené aux interventions gouvernementales actuelles dans certaines institutions. Ils font par après le constat des faits suivants: l'ampleur des maladies mentales, la diversité des clientèles psychiatriques, la désinstitutionnalisation, la finalité des hôpitaux psychiatriques et les ressources alternatives. Ils finissent en exposant le point de vue de la C.S.N. sur diverses questions: la prévention, la réinsertion sociale, le travail, la désinstitutionnalisation et la réforme des hôpitaux psychiatriques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".