MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1566329010

A Near Golden Age: The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) in New Brunswick, 1940-1949

2012· article· en· W1566329010 on OpenAlex
Laurel Lewey

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Brunswick Studies / Revue d’études sur le Nouveau-Brunswick · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesCommonwealthArtLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette histoire de la Federation du Commonwealth cooperatif (FCC) dans les annees 1940 au Nouveau-Brunswick s’ajoute aux nombreux ecrits qui denoncent la fausse perception que la FCC a rarement existe a l’est de l’Ontario. Toutefois, malgre une foule de conditions historiques, et plus tard sociales, qui ont favorise la FCC, les annees 1940 ont ete la seule decennie pendant laquelle le mouvement a suscite un espoir considerable au Nouveau-Brunswick. Cet article demontrera que la faillite du mouvement a atteindre une croissance permanente etait attribuable a plusieurs facteurs : la force de la machine politique du Parti liberal et du premier ministre John B. McNair, le sentiment antitravailliste et la campagne anti-FCC dans les medias, les defis organisationnels au sein du parti, les conditions socioeconomiques dans la province et les priorites divergentes des francophones et des anglophones du Nouveau-Brunswick.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it