MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1566346047 · doi:10.26522/brocked.v13i2.51

Approche écosystémique et fondements de l’intervention educative précoce en milieux socio- économiques faibles. Les conditions de la résilience scolaire

2004· article· fr· W1566346047 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock Education Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, nous faisons état du rôle que l’adoption d’un discours fondé sur le modèle écosystémique a joué sur le plan de l’évolution des pratiques d’intervention éducative précoce auprès de l’enfant de milieu socio-économique faible et de sa famille. Nous situons les limites des interventions qui s’y réfèrent en démontrant la variabilité des fondements épistémologiques qui les orientent et leur impact spécifique sur la conception du rapport de l’enfant aux systèmes dans lesquels il transite. Nous terminons en identifiant les obstacles au développement d’une intervention de réseau, de nature écosystémique, fondée sur une lecture constructiviste du développement, notamment dans la structure même des curriculums préscolaires ainsi que dans la lecture que les intervenants font de la compétence de l’enfant de mséf ainsi que de celle de sa famille.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it