MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1566420513 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2003.1280609

A novel maximum power point tracking method for photovoltaic grid-connected inverters

2004· article· en· W1566420513 on OpenAlexaff
Xuanyuan Wang, Mehrdad Kazerani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaximum power point trackingPhotovoltaic systemMaximum power principlePower optimizerComputer sciencePower (physics)Solar micro-inverterGridControl theory (sociology)Grid-connected photovoltaic power systemTracking (education)InverterVoltageElectronic engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)PhysicsMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel maximum power point (MPP) tracking method for photovoltaic grid-connected inverters is proposed. The distinct feature of the proposed MPP tracking algorithm is in using the power injected into the grid as the control lever for maximizing the solar array output power. The proposed MPP tracker does not need the dc/dc converter and the dc voltage support used in the conventional MPP tracking systems to control the output voltage of the solar array in search of the maximum power point. A grid-connected inverter equipped with the proposed MPP tracking system is simulated in detail using a solar array simulator. The simulation results are used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed MPP tracking algorithm in drawing maximum power from the solar array at all times while maintaining a high quality injected sinusoidal current as well as unity power factor at the grid interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207