MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1566487560 · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2003.1244602

A nonlinear prediction approach for system identification using chaos symbolic dynamic

2004· article· en· W1566487560 on OpenAlexaff
Nan Xie, Henry Leung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNonlinear systemIdentification (biology)CHAOS (operating system)AlgorithmSIGNAL (programming language)Control theory (sociology)System identificationArtificial intelligenceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we propose using a nonlinear prediction approach to identify an autoregressive (AR) system with chaos symbolic driven signal. This problem widely exists in many practical situations such as channel equalization for chaos digital communications. Although statistic-based techniques can be used to identify systems driven by chaos symbolic signals, they may not fully exploit the information contained in a deterministic chaos symbolic signal and may not result in an optimal solution. In fact, the nonlinear dynamic of a chaos symbolic signal could be properly approximated by using a radial basis function (RBF) net. Based on the short-term predictability of a chaos symbolic signal, an efficient inverse filtering identification approach is proposed. More precisely, a nonlinear prediction error criterion is used as an objective function in the inverse filtering blind identification method. Compared to the statistically optimal least square (LS) method, the proposed nonlinear predictive method is shown to greatly improve the AR system identification performance. We further apply it to combat channel distortions in a digital chaos communication system. It is found that the proposed method has satisfactory equalization performance even when channel effect is strong.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207