MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1566548182 · doi:10.4000/ahrf.7873

The Trafalgar Companion

2006· article· fr· W1566548182 on OpenAlexaff
An­nie Crépin

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique FrançaiseOakville-Trafalgar Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce recueil de huit études dues à des historiens, spécialistes de l’histoire navale, et à des professionnels, dont la plupart sont eux aussi écrivains et historiens, a été élaboré pour le bicentenaire de la bataille de Trafalgar. Il se propose d’analyser le contexte et d’explorer toutes les facettes de ce combat qui représenta une immense victoire pour l’Angleterre et fut même élevé à la hauteur d’un mythe. En dépit de quelques réserves, l’ouvrage, abondamment et intelligemment illustré, attei...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3850.198

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207