MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1566798399 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/27/5/055009

Bayesian matched-field geoacoustic inversion

2011· article· en· W1566798399 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInverse Problems · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayesian probabilityPosterior probabilityBayesian information criterionComputer scienceCovarianceInverse problemAlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Bayesian approach to matched-field geoacoustic inversion, with emphasis on rigorous uncertainty estimation Bayesian formulation, is discussed. Integration can be carried out using Markov-chain Monte Carlo importance sampling methods, such as fast Gibbs sampling. The data uncertainty distribution, which defines the likelihood function, must include both measurement errors and theory errors. Wide bounds were applied for the geoacoustic parameters to limit the inversion to physically reasonable values but allow the acoustic data to determine the solution. The KS test indicated no significant evidence against the assumption of Gaussian-distributed error processes, while the runs test suggested that the estimated data covariance matrices accounted for much, but not all, of the data error correlations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it