Staging La Francophonie: Tradition, Tourism and Acadian Musical Spaces on Prince Edward Island
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se penche sur la maniere dont les discours sur la tradition, le tourisme et l’identite s’entrecroisent dans les representations de « l’Acadie » qui se jouent sur l’Ile du Prince Edouard (IPE). En me concentrant sur le phenomene du « party de cuisine » acadien et les productions de diner-theâtre, j’examine la facon dont la communaute acadienne insulaire se represente elle-meme et est representee musicalement sur la scene culturelle de l’ile et au dehors. J’explore la facon dont le tourisme faconne le paysage culturel de l’Ile du Prince Edouard et en quoi les arrivees dans l’ile (celles des touristes) et les departs de l’ile (ceux des musiciens locaux partant en tournee) nous indiquent que l’identite francophone acadienne se comprend et s’exprime musicalement. Plus generalement, je m’interroge sur la facon dont le tourisme, qui « mercantilise » la tradition, contribue a definir et a mettre en marche le « local », et sur la maniere dont les attentes emiques et etiques resultant de ces processus se traduisent en creation artistique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".