Evaluation of MBari puck protocol for interoperable ocean observatories
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IEEE-1451[1] and OGC Sensor Web Enablement\n(OGC SWE)[2] define standard protocols to operate instruments,\nincluding methods to calibrate, configure, trigger data\nacquisition, and retrieve instrument data based on specified\ntemporal and geospatial criteria. These standards also provide\nstandard ways to describe instrument capabilities, properties, and\ndata structures produced by the instrument. These standard\noperational protocols and descriptions enable observing systems\nto manage very diverse instruments as well as to acquire, process,\nand interpret their data in a uniform and automated manner. We\nrefer to this property as “instrument interoperability”. This paper\ndescribes integration and evaluation of MBARI PUCK protocol\n[3] within different observatories including OBSEA [4,5] in\nSpain, the ESONET test-bed in Germany, and the SmartBay\nobservatory in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it