MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1567156622 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2015.7178733

General solution and approximate implementation of the multisensor multitarget CPHD filter

2015· article· en· W1567156622 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceTracking (education)Set (abstract data type)AlgorithmFinite setSimple (philosophy)MathematicsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Random finite set (RFS) based filters such as the cardinalized probability hypothesis density (CPHD) filter have been successfully applied to the problem of single sensor multitarget tracking. Various multisensor extensions of these filters have been proposed in the literature, but exact update equations for the multisensor CPHD filter have not been identified. In this paper, we provide the update equations and propose an approximate implementation. The exact implementation of the multisensor CPHD filter is infeasible even for very simple scenarios. We develop an algorithm that greedily searches for the most likely groups of measurement subsets. This enables a computationally tractable implementation. Numerical simulations are performed to compare the proposed filter implementation with other random finite set based filters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it