MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1567229336 · doi:10.1306/1215878m883271

Sequence Stratigraphy and Reservoir Architecture of the Burgan and Mauddud Formations (Lower Cretaceous), Kuwait

2006· book-chapter· en· W1567229336 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsCommunity Sector Council Newfoundland and LabradorGovernment of Newfoundland and Labrador
FundersSociety for Sedimentary Geology
KeywordsGeologyStratigraphyReservoir modelingPaleontologyCretaceousSequence stratigraphyPetroleum engineeringArchaeologyEarth scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new sequence-stratigraphic framework is proposed for the Burgan and Mauddud formations (Albian) of Kuwait. This framework is based on the integration of core, well-log, and biostratigraphic data, as well as seismic interpretation from giant oil fields of Kuwait. The Lower Cretaceous Burgan and Mauddud formations form two third-order composite sequences, the older of which constitutes the lowstand, trans-gressive, and highstand sequence sets of the Burgan Formation. This composite sequence is subdivided into 14 high-frequency, depositional sequences that are characterized by tidal-influenced, marginal-marine deposits in northeast Kuwait that grade into fluvial-dominated, continental deposits to the southwest. The younger composite sequence consists of the lowstand sequence set of the uppermost Burgan Formation and transgressive and highstand sequence sets of the overlying Mauddud Formation. This composite sequence is sand prone and mud prone in southern and southwestern Kuwait and is carbonate prone in northern and northeastern Kuwait. The lowstand sequence set deposits of the Burgan Formation are subdivided into five high-frequency depositional sequences, which are composed of tidal-influenced, marginal-marine deposits in northeastern Kuwait that change facies to fluvial-dominated deposits in southwestern Kuwait. The transgressive and highstand sequence sets of the Mauddud Formation are subdivided into eight high-frequency, depositional sequences. The Mauddud transgressive sequence set displays a lateral change in lithology from limestone in northern Kuwait to siliciclastic deposits in southern and southwestern Kuwait. The traditional lithostratigraphic Burgan-Mauddud contact is time transgressive. The Mauddud highstand sequence set is carbonate prone and thins south- and southwestward because of depositional thinning. Significant postdepositional erosion occurs at the contact with the overlying Cenomanian Wara Shale. The proposed sequence-stratigraphic framework and the incorporation of a depositional facies scheme tied to the sequence-stratigraphic architecture allow for an improved prediction of reservoir and seal distribution, as well as reservoir quality away from well control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it