MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W156754439

The Road Safety Monitor 2013: Drugs and Driving

2014· article· en· W156754439 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charlotte R Pashley, Robyn Robertson, Ward Vanlaar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationMedicineDriving under the influenceDrugAffect (linguistics)Human factors and ergonomicsTransport engineeringEnvironmental healthPoison controlEngineeringPsychologyPharmacologyPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report summarizes results from the 2013 Road Safety Monitor (RSM), an annual public opinion poll of Canadians, on drugs and driving in Canada. The 2013 RSM was completed by 1,201 Canadians and was sponsored by Beer Canada, the Toyota Canada Foundation and Aviva Canada. This report includes a background section and a results section. The background section looks at tests to detect drugs in drivers, the prevalence of drug-impaired driving, affect of various drugs, legislation and penalties for drug-impaired driving, and steps to reduce drug-impaired driving. The results section includes percentage of Canadians concerned about impaired driving, percentage of drivers engaging in impaired-driving by drug and gender, and trends in drug-impaired driving.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisFrench-language works237,207