MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1567664220 · doi:10.7202/1017914ar

Transformations de l’acte alimentaire chez les Innus et rapports identitaires

2013· article· fr· W1567664220 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Bernard Roy, Jenni Labarthe, Judith Petitpas

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCulinary Culture and Tourism
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La haute prévalence du diabète de type 2 (DT2) chez les Innus est indissociable des transformations de l’acte alimentaire émergées dans leurs communautés depuis le milieu du XX e siècle. Dans cet article, nous proposons que ces transformations s’inscrivent dans une trame identitaire collective, façonnée dans le contexte de la globalisation et de l’exclusion au travers de rapports sociaux prévalant au sein des communautés innues. Ces transformations ont permis l’inclusion dans la trame identitaire de nouveaux aliments originalement associés à la culture dominante mais qui, rapidement, sont devenus des éléments de la culture locale. Dans cet article nous situons d’abord l’émergence des transformations de l’alimentation des Innus dans des rapports politiques et socioéconomiques du milieu du XX e siècle pour mieux saisir certaines règles d’inclusion et d’exclusion qui caractérisent leur acte alimentaire contemporain. L’évolution de leurs codes alimentaires comme marqueurs de l’« identité innue » est ensuite discutée. Pour conclure, nous suggérons que les transformations de l’acte alimentaire des Innus reflètent, au niveau microsociétal, l’évolution plus globale des dynamiques sociopolitiques entre Autochtones et non-Autochtones et le durcissement des discours identitaires en réaction à l’exclusion sociale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0760.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicCulinary Culture and TourismFrench-language works237,207