Oxidation behaviour of gamma titanium aluminides with or without protective coatings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The γ-TiAl alloys are promising high temperature materials for aeroengines due to their low density, high specific strength and low material cost compared with Nickel based superalloys. However, the insufficient ductility at room temperature and the limited oxidation resistance at temperatures above approximately 750°C have limited their applications. Oxidation resistance in the application temperature range of 800 and 1000°C is of particular importance. Remarkable improvement to the environmental resistance by adding ternary and quaternary elements to the γ-TiAl alloys has been reported; however, alloying additions frequently deteriorate their mechanical properties. Surface modifications or coatings, which promote the formation of highly protective alumina scales, are also viable ways to improve the environmental resistance of TiAl alloys. In this article, the research work from the last 30 years on the oxidation behaviour of bare and coated TiAl alloys will be reviewed, with special focus on the γ-TiAl alloys. The review will begin with the oxidation behaviour of TiAl substrate alloys and the oxidation behaviour of γ-TiAl alloys with high temperature coatings such as aluminide, MCrAlY, Ti–Al– X and thermal barrier coating (TBC) system will be followed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it