MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1567896210

Negligência infantil: a modalidade mais recorrente de maus-tratos

2013· article· pt· W1567896210 on OpenAlexaff
Mara Silvia Pasian, Juliana Martins Faleiros, Marina Rezende Bazon, Carl Lacharité

Bibliographic record

VenuePensando familias · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeglectPsychological interventionPsychologyChild abuseEXPOSEDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologySuicide preventionMedicinePoison controlPsychiatryMedical emergency
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The maltreatment of children and teenagers is the most severe forms of violence, both by the number of victims who do, as the negative consequence. This article reports the specific of negligence, the modality of child maltreatment most recurrent in several countries, including Brazil, however, has been poorly investigated, and many little known. This article attempts to expose the neglect definitions that may help your understanding, reports on the associated negative consequences from this type of abuse and show the need for interventions guidance to families so that the child receives care for proper development. This work intends to place the issue raised, aiming to raise greater scientific interest and discussion on the same.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePensando familiasSame topicChild Abuse and TraumaFrench-language works237,207