Efficacy and safety of tolterodine extended‐release in men with overactive bladder symptoms treated with an α‐blocker: effect of baseline prostate‐specific antigen concentration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the efficacy and safety of a combination of tolterodine extended-release (ER) plus α-blocker treatment varies with high or low levels of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in men who have persistent overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms after any α-blocker monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men aged ≥ 40 years were eligible if they reported ≥ 8 micturitions/24 h, including ≥ 1 urgency episode/24 h with or without urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), and at least some moderate bladder-related problems at baseline despite receiving treatment with an α-blocker for ≥ 1 month. Exclusion criteria included a postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) of ≥ 200 mL and history of acute urinary retention requiring catheterization. Subjects were randomly assigned to tolterodine-ER 4 mg or placebo for 12 weeks; all subjects continued their α-blocker treatment throughout the study. Subjects completed 5-day bladder diaries at baseline and week 12, in which they recorded all micturitions and rated the sensation associated with each micturition using the 5-point Urinary Sensation Scale (USS). For this post hoc analysis, efficacy, safety, and tolerability data were stratified by the study median PSA concentration at baseline (1.41 ng/mL). RESULTS: In the tolterodine-ER +α-blocker and placebo +α-blocker groups, 160 and 159 men, respectively, had PSA levels of <1.41 ng/mL, and 166 and 160 men, respectively, had PSA levels of ≥ 1.41 ng/mL. Men with higher PSA levels were slightly older and had higher PVR at baseline compared with men with lower PSA levels. At week 12, improvements in daytime micturitions, 24-h urgency episodes, and daytime urgency episodes were significantly greater with tolterodine-ER +α-blocker vs placebo +α-blocker both in men with PSA levels of ≥ 1.41 ng/mL and those with PSA levels of < 1.41 ng/mL (P < 0.05). Among men with PSA levels of < 1.41 ng/mL, improvements in 24-h micturitions and frequency-urgency sum (sum of USS ratings for all micturitions) were also significantly greater with tolterodine-ER +α-blocker vs placebo +α-blocker (P < 0.05). There were no significant treatment differences in change in UUI episodes in either PSA group (although only 19% of subjects reported UUI at baseline), nor in nocturnal micturitions or nocturnal urgency episodes. Among men with PSA levels of ≥ 1.41 ng/mL, there was a statistically significant increase in PVR (P = 0.036) and decrease in maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max); P = 0.038) with tolterodine-ER +α-blocker vs placebo +α-blocker; these changes were not considered clinically meaningful. There were no treatment differences for changes in PVR or Q(max) among men with PSA levels of < 1.41 ng/mL. One subject receiving tolterodine-ER +α-blocker (PSA concentration of ≥ 1.41 ng/mL) and two subjects receiving placebo +α-blocker (one each in the PSA concentration subgroups of ≥ 1.41 ng/mL and < 1.41 ng/mL) had acute urinary retention requiring catheterization. CONCLUSION: In a 12-week study, the addition of tolterodine-ER to α-blocker therapy improved key OAB symptoms and appeared to be well tolerated compared with placebo +α-blocker in men with persistent OAB symptoms, regardless of subjects' prostate size as judged by serum PSA concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".