« Exclusivisme » et « inclusivisme » dans l’enseignementcatholique au Québec. Analyse de la représentation del’Amérindien dans les manuels d’histoire et d’histoire del’Église utilisés dans l’enseignement primaire et sec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The textbook is undeniably a prime source for identifying the important structures or mentality inherent in the culture of an educational system. The objective was to identify which intercultural paradigm of the “other” was prevalent in Quebec society during this period through the analysis of Canadian history and the history of the Catholic church textbooks used in French primary and secondary education in Quebec, from 1870 to 1950. The use of contemporary concepts from theology and the history of religion such as “inclusivity” and “exclusivity” is singularly apt for historical and pedagogical research of intercultural mentalities and realities in education. Thus, it is hoped that an original contribution will be made to the important structures that have shaped the teaching of religion and of the history of Quebec during the period in question. (La traduction du résumé est de Johanne Bédard et d’Andrée-Anne Talbot, sous la supervision de leur professeure d’anglais, Diane Pigeon.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".