Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep submicron technology is forcing designers away from traditional ASIC design styles toward structured arrays for the implementation of logic circuits. Structured arrays have many inherent benefits in terms of CAD tool design, testability and reliable fabrication. FPGAs and structured ASIC fabrics are two examples, but their speed, area and power overheads are high due to their programmability features. If programmability is removed, it is possible to reduce the overhead. Perhaps it is time to revisit the use of structured logic for fixed-function blocks, such as ROMs and PLAs, to determine if they are better-suited for this purpose. In particular, this paper investigates the PLA from the self-test and self-repair perspectives. ASIC blocks are known to have limitations in terms of self-test, but have little or no hope of providing self-repair. In contrast, this paper proposes straight-forward solutions for self-test and self-repair of PLAs. We find that it can provide 100% self-test coverage, and a very high probability of self-repair at the cost of area overhead
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".