MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W15687029 · doi:10.1016/j.tube.2004.09.014

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PLACE IN JOHN MUIR'S WRITINGS ABOUT WILDERNESS

2012· article· en· W15687029 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Howard, Garrett Hutson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPlace Attachment and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsWildernessEnvironmental ethicsSociologyHistoryPhilosophyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We applied the low-dose challenge (chronic) and reactivation following chemotherapy withdrawal (Cornell-like) TB models to mouse strains with genetically different susceptibility to and severity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-triggered disease. Systemic infection caused by intravenous (i.v.) administration of approximately 70 cfus of M. tuberculosis H37Rv lead to chronic, persistent, non-lethal disease in genetically resistant B6 mice, but resulted in a fatal pathological process in the lungs of susceptible I/St animals. Thus, application of the identical experimental approach to genetically different murine hosts allows investigating both slowly progressive disease with the fatal outcome (I/St) and chronic life-span disease (B6). Under Cornell-like model conditions, both temporary eradication of cultivable bacilli from lungs and spleens due to chemotherapy and their re-appearance in organs following its withdrawal were demonstrated in mice of both strains. However, (i) reactivation occurred significantly earlier in I/St than in B6 mice; (ii) I/St mice survived not more than 6 month following chemotherapy withdrawal and demonstrated 100% TB relapse, whereas in B6 mice mortality did not exceed 50%, and no mycobacteria were recovered from some animals. I/St mice, with their genetically determined high TB severity, provide a more reliable tool for modeling TB relapse after chemotherapy withdrawal than mice of more resistant strains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlace Attachment and Urban StudiesFrench-language works237,207