Incidence and Structural Variety of the Anterior Lateral Ligament of the Knee Joint (LB12)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The overall objective of this study is to show the incidence of presence of this ligament and its structural variations in both genders. I began to search for this ligament using 34 embalmed cadavers (14 females and 20 males) in December 2013. Each specimen was carefully dissected and photographed. Based on the findings in this study, the “ALL ligament” was present in 64% (9) of female and 85% (17) of male specimens. From structural point of view, in 46% (12) of cases with the “ALL ligament”, this ligament was in the form of a flat band arising from the lateral collateral ligament of the knee and gradually blending with the capsule of the knee joint above the Gerdy’s tubercle. In the remaining cases (14 = 54%) the “ALL ligament” could be followed down to the tibia close to the Gerdy’s tubercle. In this second group, the “ALL ligament” always had some attachments to the anterior end of the body of the lateral meniscus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".