MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1568883350 · doi:10.1002/9780470313978.ch31

Tape Cast AI2O3/ZrO2 Composite Laminates

2008· book-chapter· en· W1568883350 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCeramic engineering and science proceedings · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced ceramic materials synthesis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceTape castingComposite materialSinteringSuperplasticityComposite numberCeramicComposite laminatesStackingPressureless sinteringCastingMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fine Al2O3 and ZrO2 powders have been used to fabricate flexible ceramic sheets via the tape-casting process. The sheets are then formed into simple laminate shapes by stacking and thermocompression, after which the laminates are subjected to a controlled binder removal cycle. Hot-pressing (sinter-forging) of laminates results in the retention of very fine grain sizes, close to that of the original powder, with densities in excess of 98% of theoretical. Pressureless-sintering did not result in complete densification due to the formation of higher density regions at tape interfaces leading to constrained sintering in two dimensions. Pressureless-sintered composite laminates were superplastically deformed to ∼ 100% strain using a biaxial flexure test at temperatures of the order of 1450°C, without significant grain growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it