Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growing importance of the Chinese economy is a striking feature of global economic developments in the last quarter of a century. This increasing importance translates into the higher contribution to world economic growth, the significant strengthening of China’s weight in international trade flows and the significant amounts of foreign direct investment attracted by this country (Table 1). In 2004 the world economy grew by 5.1 per cent, around a quarter of that growth being attributable to China. On the other hand, growth in Chinese imports accounted for around 15% of the world trade expansion between 2000 and 2004. In 2004 China was the third largest recipient of foreign direct investment in the world. The Chinese economy still has a high growth potential. China continues to be a relative poor country, where per capita GDP is far lower than in the main advanced economies or in other Asian economies. On the other hand, the process of structural reforms observed in China since the late 1970s is likely to continue, in particular in the context of the accession to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in December 2001. Considering that China concentrates around 20 per cent of the world population, the maintenance of its economic growth and integration with the exterior process will naturally continue to influence significantly the world economy. In this context, the objective of this paper is to present the key elements that characterise the Chinese economy and its integration in the international economy. Section 2 briefly describes economic growth factors and some structural changes seen since the launching of economic reforms in the late 1970s. Section 3 focuses on China’s integration in the world economy, namely on its growing importance in international trade flows. These are largely related to the strong comparative advantage of China regarding the production and assembly of goods, where labour costs are decisive. Section 4 outlines recent macroeconomic developments, given that over the past few years concerns have arisen about an eventual “overheating” – and the consequent slowdown in the Chinese economy – and the possible impact of such developments on other economies. In turn, Section 5 presents the outlook for the Chinese economy and a number of economic policy challenges, namely as regards the financial situation of the banking and public sectors and the conduct of the monetary and foreign exchange policies. Finally, Section 6 concludes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".