MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1569146060 · doi:10.4000/gradhiva.301

La création plastique et le tournant ethnologique en Haïti

2005· article· fr· W1569146060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGradhiva · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’avènement de l’art naïf en Haïti dans les années 1940 bouleverse le monde des langages plastiques du pays. Il survient au moment où s’affirme le tournant ethnologique et apparaît comme une de ses multiples fécondations. Or deux faits se révèlent à l’analyse : d’une part le jugement esthétique qui instaure le nouveau genre artistique en Haïti ne procède pas de l’esthétique indigène prônée par l’école haïtienne d’ethnologie, d’autre part celle-ci éprouve de grandes difficultés à accompagner cet art, à le penser ou, tout simplement, à l’approcher. En fait, on est en présence de deux ordres de choses distincts advenus dans le cadre d’un même paradigme. Une parenté qui a facilité l’établissement d’une relation d’engendrement entre eux. D’autant plus que l’ethnologie propose une caractérisation globale de la société, à partir de laquelle on a pu justifier et élaborer des explications du phénomène artistique. Le discours haïtien sur l’art y a recouru, ce qui lui a valu sa force autant que sa faiblesse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it