MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1569417062

New Soviet Gypsies: Nationality, performance, and selfhood in the early Soviet Union by Brigid O'Keeffe (review)

2014· article· en· W1569417062 on OpenAlex
Yaron Matras

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRomani Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNationalityPoliticsContext (archaeology)State (computer science)Political scienceSoviet unionEmpireHistoryEconomic historySociologyLawImmigrationArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Soviet Gypsies: Nationality, performance, and selfhood in the early Soviet Union. Brigid O'Keeffe. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2013. isbn 978-1-4426-4650-6.328 pp.Reviewed by Yaron MatrasThe concept of a Romani nation still triggers controversy among scholars and policy-makers alike. Several decades before the emergence of the Romani political movement as we know it today, the idea of Romani nationhood was debated, perhaps for the very first time, in the early Soviet Union. In theory, the Soviet state allowed all non-Russians to practise their own nationhood. This included the promotion of their language, schools, theatres, and other institutions. But the Roma had been considered since imperial times to be exotic and backward, properties that were not the typical features that would define a national minority. The Roma therefore constituted an interesting test case for the policy - both in regard to what defines nationality' and in regard to the opportunities for advancement' that the Soviet state purported to offer to minority groups (p. 6). Brigid O'Keeffe tells the fascinating story of the makings of Romani nationhood in the early years of the Soviet empire. Her thesis is that Soviet nationalities policy offered Roma an opportunity to perform their belonging to the state by displaying particularity. Within the broader context of early Soviet nationalities policy, a display of selfhood was advantageous. The public discussion of minority nationhood gave Roma a chance to define both what is Roma and what is Soviet.The text is based on research of primary archive sources covering government documents, personal correspondence, newspapers and other published materials, which the author accessed at the Russian state archives in Krasnodar, Moscow, Smolensk and Volgograd, as well as in the archives of museums and other cultural institutions in St Petersburg and Moscow. The book is organised in thematic chapters. The first describes the emergence of the Romani lobbyist and activist scene, the second deals with the promotion of Romanilanguage literacy and education, the third and fourth chapters outline attempts to transform Roma into workers in industrial and agricultural collectives and to institutionalise their political as well as economic participation, while the fifth chapter deals with Romani artistic performances during the Soviet era. The Epilogue is devoted largely to the personal story of Soviet Romani activist and writer A.V. Germano, who in his essays tried to express the ambiguities of his identity as a Gypsy, a Russian, and a Soviet citizen. The book is not a conventional historiographical narrative in which events are rendered in chronological order. There are quite a few repetitions both within individual chapters as well as among them, and the story unfolds gradually. Yet it is a gripping account of the role of a small number of individuals in attempts to shape state policy and ideology toward the Roma. O'Keeffe offers insights into the internal discussions of the Romani leadership, the performance devices that they employed, collaboration with the authorities, the obstacles that they encountered within their own community and pressures from outside, as well as their enthusiasm for the momentum of change and their ideological vision. The book thus offers not only a description of events that affected Roma in a particular country during a particular period in time, but also an analysis of what was arguably the very first attempt at any Romani nationalist mobilisation, and so it is a must read for anyone with an interest in the theory and practice of Romani nationhood. The theoretical framework centres on the performative aspects of identity discourses, and here the author follows closely in the footsteps of Lemon's (2000) seminal work on Romani identity performance in Russia.The circle of Romani activists whose story is featured in the book includes 1.1. Rom-Lebedev, E. A. Poliakov, I. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it