Longitudinal outcome of first episode psychosis in adolescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is little research examining the longitudinal course and outcome of psychotic disorders in adolescence. The purpose of this study was to examine outcome in 50 adolescents 1 and 2 years after admission to the Calgary Early Psychosis programme (EPP) a comprehensive programme for early psychosis. Measures of outcome included hospital admissions, relapse rates, suicide attempts, positive and negative symptoms (PANSS), depression (CDSS), Quality of life (QOL) substance use and cognitive functioning. 50 adolescents were assessed on these measures at 12 and 24 months and compared to a group of 50 adults from EPP. The adolescent group demonstrated significant improvements in positive symptoms, depression, quality of life, alcohol and drug use (P < 0. P < 0.001). There were no differences between the adolescents and adults. These results demonstrate that adolescents with psychosis have similar outcome to as adults after 1 and 2 years of optimal treatment, even though they present earlier for treatment. However, it is possible thatthe positive effects of earlier treatment may be offset by the possible poor prognosis of the earlier age of onset of this group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".