Domestic Realms, Social Bonds, and Class: Ideologies and Indigenizing Modernity in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis la période coloniale, les Tanzaniens ont connu plusieurs formes de modernité, et chaque forme s’est concrétisée distinctement en modèles d’architecture domestique, de décor intérieur et en réseaux sociaux locaux. Cet article, avec pour modèles les habitations et les quartiers des fonctionnaires urbains, explore un processus selon lequel si les structures économiques, de classe, et politico-sociologiques influencent le monde domestique, ces structures en revanche se transforment aussi par les pratiques matérielles quotidiennes. Au fur et à mesure que l’économie politique passait du colonialisme au socialisme indigène au libéralisme globalisé, les employés de bureaux ont organisé des espaces domestiques et des modes de vie dans leurs quartiers, dont chaque modèle reflétait les facettes de structures antérieures ainsi que les innovations contemporaines. Cet exemple illustre la manière dont le concept de la modernité peut servir à faire le lien entre les modèles théoriques de structures sociales abstraites et les banales activités de la vie quotidienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".