MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1569847413 · doi:10.1109/arith.2015.11

New Bit-Level Serial GF (2^m) Multiplication Using Polynomial Basis

2015· article· en· W1569847413 on OpenAlexaff
Hayssam El-Razouk, Arash Reyhani-Masoleh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplication (music)GF(2)Polynomial basisComputer scienceArithmeticBasis (linear algebra)PolynomialBit (key)MathematicsFinite fieldDiscrete mathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Polynomial basis (PB) representation offers efficient hardware realizations of GF(2m) multipliers. Bit-level serial multiplication over GF(2m) trades-off the computational latency for lower silicon area, and hence, is favored in resource constrained applications. In such area critical applications, extra clock cycles might take place to read the inputs of the multiplication if the data-path has limited capacity. In this paper, we present a new bit-level serial PB multiplication scheme which generates its output bits in parallel after m clock cycles without requiring any preloading of the inputs, for the first time in the open literature. The proposed architecture, referred to as fully-serial-in-parallel-out (FSIPO), is useful for achieving higher throughput in resource constrained environments if the data-path for entering inputs has limited capacity, especially, for large dimensions of the field GF (2m).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207