MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1569869406

On circulant and two-circulant weighing matrices

2010· article· en· W1569869406 on OpenAlexfundno aff
K. T. Arasu, Ilias Kotsireas, Christos Koukouvinos, Jennifer R Seberry

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Online (University of Wollongong) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCirculant matrixConstruct (python library)MathematicsTable (database)HospitalityMatrix (chemical analysis)CombinatoricsOrder (exchange)Computer scienceData miningGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We employ theoretical and computational techniques to construct new weighing matrices constructed from two circulants. In particular, we construct W(148,144), W(152,144), W(156,144) which are listed as open in the second edition of the Handbook of Combinatorial Designs. We also fill a missing entry in Strassler's table with answer "YES", by constructing a circulant weighing matrix of order 142 with weight 100.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Online (University of Wollongong)Same topicgraph theory and CDMA systemsFrench-language works237,207