MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1570067410 · doi:10.7202/010015ar

Faut-il ajuster les données de recensement?

2004· article· fr· W1570067410 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nathan Keyfitz

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCensusPopulationData qualityGeographyPolitical scienceDemographySociologyEconomicsOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On oublie trop facilement de se demander quelle est la population visée par les programmes de transferts, et quel était l'objectif de la législation qui les a créés. Les fonds versés aux provinces ou aux États au titre de la santé sont destinés aux personnes malades dépourvues des moyens de se faire traiter, non aux gens en bonne santé ou assez riches pour se payer des soins. Quand on estime une population cible à partir de l'effectif de la population, l'écart entre celui-ci et la population cible atteint des ordres de grandeur beaucoup plus importants que l'écart entre la population dénombrée par le recensement et la population réelle, fl faut faire porter nos recherches sur la population cible plutôt que sur l'erreur censitaire, qui est négligeable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.092
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.348
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0920.348
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0120.013
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.015
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207