MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1570067959 · doi:10.1109/intmag.2015.7157412

Analysis of the electromagnetic torque and the effective winding inductance of a surface-mounted PMSM under integrated battery charging operation

2015· article· en· W1570067959 on OpenAlexaff
Chunyan Lai, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

Venue2015 IEEE Magnetics Conference (INTERMAG) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagnetic coilElectrical engineeringInductanceRotor (electric)InductorTorqueElectrical impedanceEngineeringVoltagePower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of integrated battery charger is attracting attentions these days. To design a motor drive system with an integrated charging capability, the machine windings are usually reconfigured to be used as the AC side inductors. Along with the switches from the drive circuitry, the AC side inductors form the voltage front-end to improve the power factor while charging. Most of the research work that was conducted was focused on the circuit topologies [1], [2] and the charger performances [3]. When looking into the basis, what will happen inside the machine when AC current is flowing through the machine windings? More specifically, the interactions between the electromagnetic field produced by the AC current excitation and the rotor magnetic field can cause electromagnetic torque and variations of the effective winding inductance. In this investigation, these two aspects, the produced torque and the impedance due to different winding configurations under a single-phase integrated charging operation employing a surface-mounted permanent magnet synchronous machine (SPMSM) drive system are analyzed. Experimental tests were conducted on a 21 HP, 8-pole SPMSM to verify the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2015 IEEE Magnetics Conference (INTERMAG)Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207