Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir de l’étude ethnographique de la rédaction d’une nouvelle Constitution en Bolivie (2006 et 2009), cet article tente de cartographier le débat autour du surgissement de l’État plurinational et décrit comment les « paysans autochtones » et leurs alliés écrivaient la Constitution en combinant un projet étatique de souveraineté et d’inclusion avec un projet autochtone pluraliste en faveur des autonomies. Parallèlement à une réflexion épistémologique sur la complexité, l’auteur examine les contestations dirigées contre ce projet de texte constitutionnel qui incluait la communauté et l’objectif de décoloniser la Bolivie à partir de formes ouvertes et ambiguës de rédaction, dans ce que l’on peut voir comme un usage stratégique et « sauvage » du droit étatique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it