MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1570426883 · doi:10.5070/g312410690

Under Ground: How Creatures of Mud and Dirt Shape Our World

2006· article· en· W1570426883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Green Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnvironmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreaturesDirtAestheticsArtHistoryGeographyArchaeologyNatural (archaeology)Cartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review: Under Ground: How Creatures of Mud and Dirt Shape Our World By Yvonne Baskin Reviewed by Kathy Piselli Atlanta-Fulton Public Library, USA Yvonne Baskin, with illustrations by Joyce Ann Powzyk Under Ground: How Creatures of Mud and Dirt Shape Our World. Washington, DC: Shearwater Press, 2005. 256pp. ISBN: 1-59726-003-7 (paperback); US$26.95. After about the age of 12 it is not easy to find popular reading material about those worms that fascinated some of us so much as children. So if you were a child who loved reading about garden critters, you will be delighted with this book on soil animals. A self-described “obsessive gardener,” science writer Yvonne Baskin has produced a fascinating book written for adults, with engaging line drawings by science illustrator and biology professor Joyce Ann Powzyk. Baskin begins with Mars. She had a bone to pick with reporters who described what NASA’s Rover mission was finding on Mars as “soil” for, as she points out, the definition of “soil” implies “life,” and so far no life has been found on Mars. On Earth, rock becomes “soil” by harboring “the most diverse and abundant web of life known in the universe,” perhaps more biologically diverse than the Amazon rainforest aboveground. These creatures literally shape our world. In spite of their critical role in our existence, the world below ground is not well studied. Microbes are not as fetching as baby chimps or as exciting as big cats. Yet Baskin manages a tour of some pretty gripping stuff, for a denizen of the underground can be an organism larger than a blue whale, heavier than a cow, or able to live in unbelievably forbidding places. The individual chapters comprise a worldwide travel itinerary. Baskin journeys with scientists of the international Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE) to study nematodes in Antarctica, microbes in Yellowstone, and fungi on Vancouver Island. Along the way she explains the role of soil animals in maintaining the earth “in a life-friendly state.” Do not miss Powzyk’s rendering of tardigrades, or water bears, on p. 45. A children’s cartoonist could not have invented such a creature from the imagination. These animals, about the size of a tiny dot, live all over the globe, including three species found in Antarctica. Among their skills is a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it