MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1570600878

Is Feminism Dead? Where Do We Go From Here

2008· article· en· W1570600878 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cara A Minardi

Bibliographic record

VenueThirdspace · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Politics, and Modernism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismFraming (construction)ConsciousnessSociologyGender studiesHistoryEpistemologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Written for the Feminist Workshops held at the 2008 annual Conference on College Composition and CommunicationA¢â‚¬â„¢s in New Orleans, this article is an attempt to answer the question, is feminism dead? The author argues that feminism is not dead, but difficult to recognize because it has been naturalized. Framing feminism as becoming is Gerda LernerA¢â‚¬â„¢s definition of feminist consciousness, which the author uses to demonstrate a historical pattern of feminisms as becoming. The author then turns to the contemporary scene to explore differing standards of feminisms for young women in order to demonstrate that the pattern of becoming continues in feminism today, vitalizing feminisms for the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.031
Scholarly communication0.0200.036
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0080.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThirdspaceSame topicArt, Politics, and ModernismFrench-language works237,207