MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1570600878

Is Feminism Dead? Where Do We Go From Here

2008· article· en· W1570600878 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cara A Minardi

Bibliographic record

VenueThirdspace · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Politics, and Modernism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismFraming (construction)ConsciousnessSociologyGender studiesHistoryEpistemologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Written for the Feminist Workshops held at the 2008 annual Conference on College Composition and CommunicationA¢â‚¬â„¢s in New Orleans, this article is an attempt to answer the question, is feminism dead? The author argues that feminism is not dead, but difficult to recognize because it has been naturalized. Framing feminism as becoming is Gerda LernerA¢â‚¬â„¢s definition of feminist consciousness, which the author uses to demonstrate a historical pattern of feminisms as becoming. The author then turns to the contemporary scene to explore differing standards of feminisms for young women in order to demonstrate that the pattern of becoming continues in feminism today, vitalizing feminisms for the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThirdspaceSame topicArt, Politics, and ModernismFrench-language works237,207