FGFR1 is fused to the centrosome-associated proteinCEP110 in the 8p12 stem cell myeloproliferative disorder with t(8;9)(p12;q33)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hallmark of the 8p12 stem cell myeloproliferative disorder (MPD) is the disruption of the FGFR1 gene, which encodes a tyrosine kinase receptor for members of the fibroblast growth factor family. FGFR1 can be fused to at least 3 partner genes at chromosomal regions 6q27, 9q33, or 13q12. We report here the cloning of the t(8;9)(p12;q33) and the detection of a novel fusion betweenFGFR1 and the CEP110 gene, which codes for a novel centrosome-associated protein with a unique cell-cycle distribution. CEP110 is widely expressed at various levels in different tissues and is predicted to encode a 994-amino acid coiled-coil protein with 4 consensus leucine zippers [L-X(6)-L-X(6)-L-X(6)-L]. Both reciprocal fusion transcripts are expressed in the patient's cells. The CEP110-FGFR1 fusion protein encodes an aberrant tyrosine kinase of circa 150-kd, which retains most of CEP110 with the leucine zipper motifs and the catalytic domain of FGFR1. Transient expression studies show that the CEP110-FGFR1 protein has a constitutive kinase activity and is located within the cell cytoplasm. (Blood. 2000;95:1788-1796)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".