La red internacional de rayos cósmicos, Manuel Sandoval Vallarta y la física en México
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"As part of the establishment of an international cosmic ray network for studying the geographical distribution of cosmic rays, in 1932 Arthur Holly Compton organized a huge expedition to North Canada, Michigan, Illinois, Hawaii, New Zealand, Australia, Peru, and Mexico. In this expedition a group of experts was coordinated and distributed by different travel routes.For arranging this cosmic ray network it was necessary to contact with people and institutions at the local places where the measurements were to be taken. Also,it was implied the construction and standardization of instruments, as well as the techniques to take measurements. Circulation of scientific instruments, persons and practices were essential for executing the expedition. Mexico was one of the places where the cosmic ray measurements were taken. It was through intervention of Manuel Sandoval Vallarta (who at the moment was Associate Professor of the Physics Department at the MIT) that this could be done. Also, a group of engineers from the University of Mexico participated in this task. At the end of the thirties, this collaboration was used as a key factor for the creation of the first institute of physics in Mexico."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".