Monocular Accommodation Response for Totally Occluded Objects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy and stability of the monocular accommodation response when attention is directed toward a totally occluded distant object. METHODS: A static infrared optometer was used to measure the monocular accommodative response in 16 participants while they viewed a distant letter target in the presence or absence of an intervening object that totally occluded the distant target from view. Participants were instructed to attend to and focus for the distant target. RESULTS: Participants differed widely in their accommodative responses for a totally occluded distant object, focusing close to the distant object, close to the intervening object, in between the two objects, and beyond the distant object. Some of this variability could be attributed to individual differences in the dark focus. Accommodation was more variable when the distant target was totally occluded by an obstruction at an intermediate distance (50 cm). CONCLUSIONS: Many individuals focus poorly in the presence of a visual obstruction that totally occludes the object of regard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".